Suche - Search - Pretraživanje


More than 75 years (in 2020) of the UN -

And what condition does the world look like?


What has humanity learned in the last almost 80 years after the two world wars, as a result of which this global organization with the claim "Shaping our future together" was founded? 

A New Era
of Conflict and Violence

The nature of conflict and violence has transformed substantially since the UN was founded 75 years ago. Conflicts now tend to be less deadly and often waged between domestic groups rather than states. Homicides are becoming more frequent in some parts of the world, while gender-based attacks are increasing globally. The long-term impact on development of inter-personal violence, including violence against children, is also more widely recognized.

Separately, technological advances have raised concerns about lethal autonomous weapons and cyberattacks, the weaponization of bots and drones, and the livestreaming of extremist attacks. There has also been a rise in criminal activity involving data hacks and ransomware, for example. Meanwhile, international cooperation is under strain, diminishing global potential for the prevention and resolution of conflict and violence in all forms.



Globally, the absolute number of war deaths has been declining since 1946. And yet, conflict and violence are currently on the rise, with many conflicts today waged between non-state actors such as political militias, criminal, and international terrorist groups. Unresolved regional tensions, a breakdown in the rule of law, absent or co-opted state institutions, illicit economic gain, and the scarcity of resources exacerbated by climate change, have become dominant drivers of conflict.


In 2016, more countries experienced violent conflict than at any point in almost 30 years. At the same time, conflicts are becoming more fragmented. For example, the number of armed groups involved in the Syrian civil war has¬ mushroomed from eight to several thousand since the outbreak of the conflict. Furthermore, the regionalisation of conflict, which interlinks political, socio-economic and military issues across borders, has seen many conflicts become longer, more protracted, and less responsive to traditional forms of resolution.




Today, crime kills far more people than armed conflicts. In 2017, almost half a million people across the world were killed in homicides, far surpassing the 89,000 killed in active armed conflicts and the 19,000 killed in terrorist attacks. If homicide rates keep climbing at the current rate of 4 per cent, then Sustainable Development Goals 16 – which includes a target ‘to significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere’ – will not be met by 2030. 


Organised crime and gang violence vary widely across regions. Countries in the Americas have the worst homicide rates by a wide margin, accounting for 37 per cent of the global total in a region that accounts for only 13 per cent of the world’s population. Political instability engenders organised crime, including targeted attacks against police, women, journalists, and migrants. Meanwhile political violence no longer affects only low-income states. In the past 15 years, more than half of the world’s population has lived in direct contact or proximity to significant political violence. 


For women and girls, the home remains the most dangerous place. Some 58 per cent of female homicides were carried out by intimate partners or family members in 2017, up from 47 per cent in 2012. Women bear the heaviest burden of lethal victimisation, often as a result of misogynistic beliefs, inequality, and dependency, which persist globally, especially in low-in-come countries.




While terrorism remains widespread, its impact has been waning in recent years. Globally, the number of deaths attributed to terrorism dropped for a third consecutive year in 2018, to under 19,000. Attacks have become less lethal as governments step up counter-terrorism efforts, regional and international coordination, and programmes to prevent and counter violent extremism. In 2017, a fifth of terrorist attacks were unsuccessful, compared with just over 12 per cent in 2014. 


Conflict remains the primary driver of terrorism, with more than 99 per cent of all terrorist-related deaths occurring in countries involved in a violent conflict or with high levels of political terror. The majority of deadly attacks take place in the Middle East, North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa, with Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, and Syria, bearing the heaviest burden. 


In countries with high levels of economic development, social alienation, lack of economic opportunity, and state involvement in an external conflict are the major drivers of terrorist activity. In Western Europe, terrorism-related deaths have fallen dramatically in the past few years, but the number of incidents has increased. There has been a sizeable increase in the number of attacks carried out by actors with far-right, white nationalist, or anti-Muslim beliefs in both Western Europe and North America in the past two decades. The number of incidents across the two regions increased from three in 2002 to 59 in 2017, with social media playing a crucial role in the dissemination of xenophobic speech and incitement to violence.

Extremist groups today have unprecedented access to the general public through the internet, which allows for more efficient and effective recruitment, incitement, and propaganda, as well as the purchase of weapons and unregulated money transfers. Both state and non-state actors can also use AI-enabled deep learning to create ‘deepfakes,’ which create seemingly real footage of people speaking words they never uttered and have the potential to fuel misinformation, divisions, and political instability.




Technological advances are contributing to the changing nature of conflict. There are concerns about the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to enhance cyber, physical, and biological attacks. For example, by making them more finely targeted,  harder to attribute, and easier for small groups perhaps even ‘lone wolfs’ to carry out.


Emerging technologies are lowering the barriers to the acquisition of biological weapons – toxic substances or diseases used to harm or kill humans, livestock, and crops. There are concerns that advances in AI and 3D printing could facilitate biological attacks, by automating the development and production of the weapons and the systems that develop them.


There is also mounting international concern over the development of so-called lethal autonomous weapons (LAWs), which could identify and engage a specific target without human guidance, thereby transferring responsibility over life and death from human moral systems to complex data systems, devoid of an ethical compass. The UN Secretary-General has called for fully autonomous weapons to be prohibited by international law, as have over 30 nations.


Perhaps the most prevalent modern-day threat is that of cyber-attacks. According to IBM’s X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services, the number of cyber-attacks doubled in the first half of 2019 in comparison with the second half of 2018, most of them targeting manufacturers, oil and gas companies, and educational institutes. Owners of critical infrastructure are especially at risk, as malicious actors seek to target airport control towers, nuclear power plants, hospitals, and dams. Over the past year, more than a hundred cyber incidents with the potential to undermine international peace and security were identified. Such attacks would cause substantial damage and casualties.


On the flip side, advances in AI and other technologies also provide new tools and preventive strategies for police and counterintelligence agencies to better prevent attacks and identify perpetrators. But here too there are risks. For example, predictive policing comes with its own downsides, including inbuilt racial and religious biases, which can engender radicalisation to violent extremism.




Today, we are witnessing the unravelling of the international arms control architecture and a gradual backtracking on established arms control agreements, which have supported global stability, restraint, and transparency. The continued existence of nuclear weapons poses an ever-greater threat to the survival of humanity. While the number of nuclear weapons has dropped from more than 60,000 during the Cold War to around 14,000 today, nuclear weapons are more powerful today. At the same time relations between nuclear-armed states are fraying, and divisions over the pace and scale of disarmament are growing. 

When the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty ended in August 2019, the UN Secretary-General deplored the loss of “an invaluable brake on nuclear war”. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) faces a similar demise. The total elimination of nuclear weapons can still be achieved, but it will require a renewed commitment to trust and cooperation between the world’s most powerful countries. The Secretary-General has called on states to renew fervour on outstanding and current arms control agreements. 




In 1945, the UN was primarily designed as a tool to manage interstate relations as the world reeled from the horrors of two world wars. While today’s world is in many ways safer, the nature of threat has evolved considerably. New, more complex and more sophisticated threats require imaginative and bold responses, and strengthened collaboration between states, as well as the private sector and civil society. Institutional boundaries must also be bridged, so that political, human rights, and development partners can work in concert.


Source: https://www.un.org/en/un75/new-era-conflict-and-violence

Ukraine: UN General Assembly demands Russia reverse course on ‘attempted illegal annexation’


The UN General Assembly passed a resolution by a large majority already on Wednesday, Oct 22, 2022, calling on countries not to recognise the four regions of Ukraine which Russia has claimed, following so-called referendums held late last month, and demanding that Moscow reverse course on its "attempted illegal annexation":


The results were 143 Member States in favour, with five voting against, and 35 abstentions. The countries who voted against were Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Nicaragua, Russia and Syria.

A majority of those countries abstaining were African nations, alongside China and India.

The resolution “defending the principles” of the UN Charter, notes that the regions of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia are temporarily occupied by Russia as a result of aggression, violating Ukraine’s territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence.

The General Assembly automatically took up the resolution for debate, triggered by Russia’s use of the veto in the Security Council over it’s attempted annexation.

Immediate reversal

The resolution now passed in the Assembly, calls on all States, the UN and international organisations not to recognize any of Russia’s annexation claim and demands the immediate reversal of its annexation declaration.

The resolution welcomes and “expresses its strong support” for the continued efforts by the Secretary-General and Member States, to de-escalate the current situation in search of peace through dialogue, negotiation and mediation.

The debate over the Ukrainian resolution began on Monday, with the General Assembly President Csaba Kőrösi telling the world’s most representative deliberative body that the UN Charter, the Secretary-General, and the Assembly itself had been clear – Russia’s invasion, and attempted annexation of Ukrainian territory by force, “is illegal”.

Civilian areas bombarde

Since Monday morning, Russia has launched dozens of missiles targeting civilian areas of multiple Ukrainian cities, leading to dozens of deaths and injuries, in retaliation for the bombing of Russia’s bridge to Crimea on Saturday. UN Secretary-General António Guterres said the assault was “another unacceptable escalation” in Russia’s February 24 invasion of its neighbour.

Speaking at the start of the debate on Monday, Mr. Kőrösi said that “when it becomes a daily routine to watch images of destroyed cities and scattered bodies, we lose our humanity…We must find a political solution based on the UN Charter and the international law.”

Secret ballot rejected

The debate began with a procedural vote on a measure which Russia had flagged, proposing that the Ukrainian draft resolution being debated, be voted on by secret ballot, not through an open recorded vote.

The Albanian proposal received 107 votes in favour, with 13 against, and 39 abstentions, with the country’s representative arguing that it would establish a “dangerous precedent” if such a substantive issue of peace and security was voted on in secret.

Ukraine: UN General Assembly demands Russia reverse course on ‘attempted illegal annexation’ | | 1UN News)

And what happened thereafter?! Killing and suffering continued... 
For the latest updates check here: 

Anti-Establishment und Eliten-Bashing ist en vogue!
...Aber es ist nicht unbedingt immer klug, den selbsernannten "Alternativen" die Stimme zu geben.


Es ist fraglich, ob in einer etablierten Demokratie mit einer funktionierenden sozialen Marktwirtschaft Protestwahlen je irgendein Problem gelöst und das Leben der Menschen besser gemacht haben - oder nicht eher zur Vergrößerung der Probleme beigetragen haben. 


Wünschen wir uns, dass es weiterhin vernünftige und verantwortungsbewusst handelnde Personen an den entsprechenden Stellen geben wird, die es dann doch wieder richten, obwohl es ihnen viele nicht danken werden.




Anti-establishment and elite bashing is en vogue!
... But it is not necessarily always wise to give ones vote to the self-imposed "alternatives".


It is questionable whether, in an established democracy with a functioning social market economy, protest elections have solved any problem and made the lives of the people better - or whether they have not rather contributed to the enlargement of problems.


Let us wish that there will continue to be reasonable and responsible people in the appropriate places, which will fix it again, although many will not thank them.



Anti-establishment i udaranje po elitama je postalo jako popularno!

... Ali nije uvijek baš mudro dati svoj glas samoproglašenim „alternativama“.


Pitanje je, dali su u bilo kojoj uspostavljenoj demokraciji u kojoj socijalna tržišna ekonomija djeluje, izbori prosvjednog karaktera riješili bilo koji problem i poboljšali život ljudi ili nisu li možda na suprot čak pridonijeli proširenju problema.


Želimo sami sebi da i dalje budu razumni i odgovorni ljudi na odgovarajućim mjestima, koji će na kraju ipak svojim dobrim radom osigurat blagostanje, iako im mnogi to neće zahvaliti.



Wenn Sie manchmal auch einfach mal allem entfliehen möchten:

Wer über den Link https://www.booking.com/s/da7735a5 (oder Klick auf das Logo) bei booking.com bucht, erhält EUR 15,- von seinen Buchungskosten zurück!



If you sometimes just want to get away from it all:

If you book through the link https://www.booking.com/s/da7735a5 (or click on the logo) at booking.com, you will get a € 15,- cash-back!



Ako ponekad jednostavno želite pobjeći od svega:

Ako rezervirate preko link-a https://www.booking.com/s/da7735a5 (ili kliknite na logo) na Booking.com-u, dobiti ćete od svojih troškova rezervacije 15,- Eura natrag!

€ 15 Cash back for bokking of travel or hotel, when following this link € 15,- zurück, bei Buchung über diesen Link - cash back reward, when using this link - natrag, ako koristite ovaj link!
Sarcevic.de - News, Capital Markets, Collection, RS-Events Sarcevic.de - Home of RS©


Daily Quotes by CalendarLabs
Russia reverse course on attempted illegal annexation - and follow UN´s demand! Russia reverse course on attempted illegal annexation - and follow UN´s demand!
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I´ll defend to the death your right to say it." (Friends of Voltaire) You have the right to think and to speak! Du hast das Recht, zu denken und zu sprechen! Imaš pravo da misliš i da govoriš! - Je suis Charlie
To date, the actions by our global community along with our high level advocacy efforts and with our partners, have resulted in 130 commitments and policy announcements from leaders, including financial aid valued at over $30 billion that is set to affect the lives of 1 billion people.

I am a #GlobalCitizen

To date, the actions by our global community along with our high level advocacy efforts and with our partners, have resulted in 130 commitments and policy announcements from leaders, including financial aid valued at over $30 billion that is set to affect the lives of 1 billion people.
Join us!

UNICEF leistet für Kinder in Not umfassende Hilfe und braucht dringend Ihre Unterstützung! Bitte spenden Sie jetzt!

UNICEF works in over 190 countries and territories to save children's lives, to defend their rights, and to help them fulfil their potential, from early childhood through adolescence!
Please support them by donating - Bitte spenden Sie - Molim vas, donirajte!

Druckversion | Sitemap
© Robert Sarcevic 2019/2001ff.